1Password
Senior Developer Advocate
$133K–$186K
United States +2 · Remote · Senior · Full-time · Posted Sep 30, 2026
- Location
- United States
San Francisco, CA
New York, NY - Experience
- 5+ years in technical roles.
About the job
Build 1Password’s developer advocacy presence through code-first demos, video and written content, community engagement, open-source strategy, and conference speaking, with a focus on identity and access control for AI agents.
What you'll do
- Create demos, videos, tutorials, blog posts, and reference code showing developers how to use 1Password, especially for securing AI agents and machine identities.
- Grow 1Password’s developer presence and community on Reddit, YouTube, and X, and represent the company at developer conferences.
- Guide open-source priorities, including SDKs, integrations, and MCP servers/tools.
What they ask for
- 5+ years in a technical role such as software/platform engineering, developer advocacy, or solutions engineering; able to write code for demos.
- Existing technical voice and audience on X, YouTube, or Reddit.
- Hands-on experience building AI agents and working with MCP (Model Context Protocol).
- Experience creating and editing video content, growing developer communities, contributing to or maintaining open-source projects, and speaking at major developer conferences.
Nice to have
- Experience with security-conscious developer communities or products, such as identity, auth, or DevSecOps.
- Contributions to or maintenance of MCP servers, agent frameworks, or related open-source tooling.
Pay
USD $133,000 USD to $186,000 USD annual base salary
Tools
1Password, MCP (Model Context Protocol), SDKs, MCP servers/tools, Reddit, YouTube, X
AI focus
Advocate for 1Password’s identity and access-control capabilities for AI agents; create demos focused on securing agents, service accounts, and machine identities. The posting also describes company-wide AI use in product development and AI/ML use in application screening.
Model-written summary · the original posting is authoritative