Amazon
Applied Scientist - ML and Robotics
$143K–$193K
North Reading, MA · Full-time · Posted May 29, 2026
- Experience
- 4+ years of science, technology, engineering or related field experience, required with a Master's degree; alternatively, a PhD is required.
- Education
- PhD, or Master's degree and 4+ years of science, technology, engineering or related field experience.
About the job
Develop and deploy learning-based manipulation controllers for Amazon Robotics that operate reliably in contact-rich, uncertain environments, from research and experiments through production systems.
What you'll do
- Research, implement, and evaluate machine-learning manipulation policies integrated with feedback control, estimation, and motion planning.
- Train and validate policies through simulation and real-hardware experiments under real-world variability and uncertainty.
- Collaborate across science and engineering teams to transition research prototypes into scalable production robotics systems.
What they ask for
- PhD, or a Master's degree and 4+ years of science, technology, engineering or related field experience.
- Experience in patents or publications at top-tier peer-reviewed conferences or journals.
- Experience programming in Java, C++, Python or related language.
- Experience designing, running, and analyzing experiments in simulation and on real robotic hardware.
Nice to have
- Experience developing manipulation policies for contact-rich tasks and integrating robot dynamics, control, or state estimation with data-driven methods.
- Hands-on experience with reinforcement learning, imitation learning, hybrid learning–control, simulation tools, or sim-to-real transfer for robotics.
Pay
142,800.00 - 193,200.00 USD annually (base salary)
Tools
Java, C++, Python
AI focus
Develop machine-learning manipulation policies and learning frameworks using real-world data, simulation, and hybrid physics- and data-driven models; validate learned policies and transition them into production robotics systems.
Model-written summary · the original posting is authoritative