CGS Federal (Contact Government Services)
eDiscovery Analytics Lead
$89K–$121K
Dallas, TX +3 · Hybrid · Full-time · Posted Mar 13, 2026
- Location
- Dallas, TX
Remote
Hybrid
Austin, TX - Experience
- At least 5 years of eDiscovery services and litigation-support experience; undergraduate degree and 5+ years of prior relevant experience.
- Education
- Undergraduate degree required. Law degree, technical certification, or other pertinent graduate degree strongly preferred.
- Visa sponsorship
- Must be a United States Citizen.
About the job
Provides eDiscovery technical, analytical, and litigation-support services for a federal agency, including processing, analytics, and production compliance using Relativity.
What you'll do
- Develop and implement electronic-file processing approaches; support compliance with ESI specifications and report production deficiencies.
- Perform advanced Relativity analytics and maintain Active Learning Projects, Case Map/Text Map databases, and custom PowerShell scripts.
- Provide reporting, technology guidance, and consistent eDiscovery procedures throughout litigation matters.
What they ask for
- At least 5 years of eDiscovery services and litigation-support experience on complex, large cases.
- Thorough knowledge of litigation discovery and the EDRM workflow; prior experience managing eDiscovery projects and related technologies.
- Advanced Relativity knowledge, including front end and back end; advanced hands-on Active Learning experience.
- Ability to generate complex PowerShell scripts; undergraduate degree; must be a United States Citizen.
Nice to have
- Law degree, technical certification, or other pertinent graduate degree; knowledge of advanced Relativity searches, workflows, permissions, and Case Dynamics.
- In-depth hands-on Case Map and Text Map experience; ability to obtain Public Trust security clearance.
Pay
USD 89,301.33–121,194.66 per-year-salary (base salary)
Tools
Relativity, PowerShell, Case Map, Text Map, Active Learning
Model-written summary · the original posting is authoritative