May Mobility
Senior Product Safety Architect II
$125K–$160K
Ann Arbor, MI - Hybrid +1 · Senior · Full-time · Posted Apr 17, 2026
- Location
- Ann Arbor, MI - Hybrid
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States - Experience
- 7+ years of related work experience, with at least 3 years in autonomous vehicle or advanced robotics system architecture.
- Education
- Bachelor’s degree or equivalent experience in Systems Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, or a related technical discipline.
About the job
Defines and owns the end-to-end safety architecture and safety case for May Mobility’s L4 autonomous driving system, embedding verifiable safety requirements across development.
What you'll do
- Define system safety architecture, derive and allocate safety requirements from hazard analyses, and manage the safety plan and launch schedule.
- Address AI/ML safety risks with architectural mitigations, and create and review safety analyses and work products.
- Coordinate safety activities with development teams and stakeholders, including safety audits and assessments.
What they ask for
- Bachelor’s degree or equivalent experience in Systems Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, or a related technical discipline.
- 7+ years of related work experience, including at least 3 years in autonomous vehicle or advanced robotics system architecture.
- Demonstrable exposure to AI/ML safety challenges in safety-critical applications.
- Working knowledge of UL 4600 and ISO 26262 safety frameworks and practices.
Nice to have
- Master’s degree in Systems Engineering, Computer Science, or a related field; specialization in AI safety, dependable systems, or autonomous systems.
- Experience authoring or contributing to a UL 4600 safety case or equivalent structured safety argument (GSN/CAE) for a deployed autonomous system.
Pay
$125,000 — $160,000 USD (base salary)
Tools
UL 4600, ISO 26262, ISO 21448, HARA, FMEA, FTA, FMEDA, DFA
AI focus
Identify AI/ML safety risks such as distributional shift, model uncertainty, and failure mode opacity; define mitigations including runtime monitors, confidence thresholds, and safe fallback behaviors, and extend safety analyses to ML failure modes.
Model-written summary · the original posting is authoritative