Drimva

Rubrik

Global Resource Management Leader, Professional Services

$128K–$233K

USA , Remote +1 · Remote · Full-time · Posted Aug 26, 2026

Location
USA , Remote
United States - Remote
Experience
7–10 years of direct experience in resource management, capacity planning, or professional services operations leveraging PSA’s and AI.
Education
Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Business, Engineering, or a related technical field preferred; equivalent practical experience welcomed.

About the job

Build and lead Rubrik’s global Professional Services resource management and capacity planning function, standardizing processes and improving forecasting, data integrity, and executive decision-making.

What you'll do

  • Establish and operate global resource management, capacity planning, and forecasting systems across NAM, EMEA, and APAC.
  • Standardize processes, implement a PSA system of record, and improve automation, reporting, and data quality.
  • Manage subcontractor capacity and partner with Delivery, Finance, HR, and executives on demand, utilization, and talent planning.

What they ask for

  • Direct experience managing a subcontractor ecosystem as an extension of a Consulting or Delivery team.
  • Demonstrated success building and managing resource management or capacity planning systems and teams for a global Professional Services business.
  • Significant executive-level exposure, including presenting complex data and influencing senior stakeholders.
  • Extensive cross-functional experience partnering across global teams and operational boundaries.

Nice to have

  • Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Business, Engineering, or a related technical field; equivalent practical experience welcomed.

Pay

$155,500 — $233,300 USD (base salary); $128,000 — $217,800 USD (base salary)

Tools

PSA’s, AI

AI focus

Apply AI in professional services resource management and capacity planning; the role also calls for understanding of AI and process automation.

Model-written summary · the original posting is authoritative

First seen Oct 27, 2026 · Last verified Nov 5, 2026 (UTC)