StudyFetch
AI Research Scientist, Learning & Evaluation
$180K–$280K
Beverly Hills, CA · On-site · Full-time · Posted Jul 28, 2026
- Experience
- 5+ years applying a quantitative field to products or research with a PhD; alternatively, a track record of owning evaluation or measurement for a shipped AI product.
- Education
- PhD in statistics, computer science, machine learning, economics, physics, computational social science, or another quantitative field; alternatively, the posting accepts fewer credentials with the specified shipped-product track record.
About the job
Build the evaluation and measurement systems used to assess StudyFetch and Honen AI models, product decisions, and learning outcomes.
What you'll do
- Design and run model evaluations, including a multi-turn tutoring benchmark, and set release standards.
- Use product and expert-verified assessment data to inform model training and measure learning outcomes; build analytics and reporting across both products.
- Identify missing telemetry and work with engineering to improve instrumentation and establish measurement practices.
What they ask for
- PhD in a quantitative field plus 5+ years applying it to products or research, or a track record of owning evaluation or measurement for a shipped AI product.
- Production experience evaluating LLMs and the ability to explain an evaluation suite you built and its limitations.
- Rigor in experimental design, causal inference, controls, and sample-size reasoning.
- Clear written and verbal communication.
Nice to have
- Learning science, psychometrics, or item response theory.
- Experience with children's data and its associated rules.
Pay
$180,000–$280,000 USD base salary
Tools
Python, Pandas, NumPy, SciPy, Jupyter, SQL, MongoDB, PostgreSQL
AI focus
Evaluate and improve AI tutoring models for learning outcomes, including accuracy, reasoning, child safety, resistance to sycophancy, and Socratic teaching; build multi-turn tutoring benchmarks and turn product data into training signals.
Model-written summary · the original posting is authoritative